Hoping you've all been having a grand old time, and you and your loved ones are not all ready to brain each other. Over here, I always thought that the institution of the Boxing Day match fulfils a valuable social function in that regard. Anyway, enough of the small talk. I've been thinking about how to 'Christen' my new armies. Two main options occur:
(1) A straightforward 're-fight';
(2) Run a new mini-campaign along the same sort of lines I did last year, but limited to Italy.
Being a methodical sort, I drew up a table of battles in Italy in the 1740s (see below). 1744 looks very busy. I don't know if I missed any. This is a relatively new theatre to me. I just relied on Wiki*, and the appendix to The Art of War in the Age of Marlborough, which ends in 1745. But I quite fancy doing the campaign. I could dust off the old rules, tweak them a bit to reflect the constrained geography. And Italy lends itself better to a long thin table.
Battle | Year | Date | Bourbon contestants | Bourbon number | Habsburg-Savoy contestants | Habsburg-Savoy number |
Campo Santo | 1743 | 8 Feb | Spain, Naples | 11,400 infantry, 2,600 cavalry, 12 guns | Austria | 9,000 infantry, 3,000 cavalry, 25 guns |
Casteldelfino | 1744 | 18 Jul | France | 5,000 | Piedmont | 2,000 |
Velletri I | 1744 | 17 Jun | Spain | 5,000 | Austria | 1,000 |
Bellino | 1744 | 17-19 Jul | France, Spain | 24,000 | Piedmont | 6,000 |
Velletri II | 1744 | 11 Aug | Spain, Naples | 24,000 | Austria | 16,000 |
Villafranca | 1744 | 14-27 Apr | France, Spain | 30,000 | Piedmont, Britain | 8,000 |
Casteldelfino | 1744 | 18 Jul | France | 5,000 | Piedmont | 2,000 |
Madonna Dell’Olmo | 1744 | 30 Sep | France, Spain | 33,700 | Piedmont, Austria | 28-36,000 |
Bassignana | 1745 | 27 Sep | France, Spain, Genoa | 70,000 | Piedmont, Austria | 55,000 |
Piacenza | 1746 | 16 Jun | Spain, France | 25,000 Sp, 15,000 Fr | Austria | 45,000 |
Rottofreddo | 1746 | 10 Aug | France, Spain | 25,000 | Austria | 30,000 |
Assietta | 1747 | 19 Jul | France | 25,000 | Piedmont | 15,000 |
Apologies for the formatting of this table. I had everything neatly aligned in the document I created it in, but Blogger seems to be throwing a spanner in the works.
I might have to invent some rules to reflect events outside the theatre which impinge on it. E.G. Frederick's invasion of Bohemia in 1744, kicking off the Second Silesian War, might cause the Austrians to pull back some troops from Italy. Something to ponder during Escape to Victory, or whichever classic film is put on the telly, if I'm not reading this:
One thing that the little exercise of pulling together this table did do, is remind me that there were several factions involved. On the 'Bourbon' side was the Kingdom of Naples (aka the Kingdom of Sicily*), ruled at this time by a son of the Spanish King Philip V, so an actual Bourbon, and the Republic of Genoa. Genoa, a regional rival of Piedmont, joined the Bourbon alliance part way through the war. In addition, I think the Duchy of Modena also provided troops for the Spanish side at some point. And the Royal Navy provided 1,000 marines for the fence of Villafranca/Villefranche (a port just east of Nice).
* I must do an explanation of the names at some point. Piedmont/Sardinia/(House of)Savoy is another one.
It always seems 'complicated ' in Italy!
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Even those nominally on the same side had objectives different enough to cause splits in the conduct of campaigns.
DeleteChris
Interesting theme. My introduction to it was Christopher Duffy's excellent biography of Maximilian von Browne.
ReplyDeleteMine too.
DeleteChris
A campaign I think would be the best option, but a small one (3-5 games) and quite simple too, based upon my experience. Anything longer or too complicated tends to lose steam, or maybe I'm a shallow knave who doesn't want anything too complicated😉!
ReplyDeleteAs for trying to understand the complicated picture of who ruled what, was in alliance with whom etc, I am reminded of the following quote by Palmerston:
“The Schleswig-Holstein question is so complicated, only three men in Europe have ever understood it. One was Prince Albert, who is dead. The second was a German professor who became mad. I am the third and I have forgotten all about it.”
I can never remember the whole of that quote about the Schleswig-Holstein Question. Does that mean I’m Palmerston?
DeleteThe campaign I was thinking of was going to be like I did last year. A gridded table top of Italy, using figures with a vase representing X thousand troops. Battles and sieges would be played out in highly stylised fashion - a couple of opposed die rolls. Do the whole thing would be relatively simple and completed within hours.
Chris
Base not vase! Though you could use small vases come to think of it.
DeleteChris
Never could remember who’s who or what’s what in this period - but go for it, it should be fun to watch you play these out.
ReplyDeleteWell it’s like this….Elizabeth Farnese, 2nd wife of Philip V of Spain (grandson of Louis XIV and uncle of Louis XV of France) ….their son Charles, Duke of Parma, seized the Kingdom of Naples in 1734. Elizabeth wanted a throne in Italy her 2nd son Philip…meanwhile the Infante Ferdinand, 3rd son of Philip V (the other two died young) by his first wife, Maria Luisa Gabriella of Savoy, ….Then there’s the French branch of the Bourbons….
DeleteConfused? You will be after this week’s episode of Soap.
Chris
I think you’ve made my point for me! Ah Soap…classic.
DeleteSounds like lots to ponder Chris... but isn't this part of what we love about our hobby.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to how this progresses.
It is indeed part of the fun Richard.
DeleteChris
I found this comment intriguing " Italy lends itself better to a long thin table." Is that because it's a long thin country, or are the battles of this period fought over long, thin countryside? :)
ReplyDeleteOur "classic" Christmas movies this year were - Christmas Day - Downton Abbey - The Movie; Boxing Day - Downton Abbey - The Sequel!
Ah ha! It was the first. Actually, I’m wrong. It’s a long thin country with a fat but at the top. T-shaped really.
DeleteLots to keep me amused on telly this year, if I hadn’t seen them too often. Several episodes of Sharpe, A Bridge Too Far, 55 Days at Peking etc.
Chris
Watched 20mins of the Italian Job - having seen it a gazillion times already over the years. Great film still.
DeleteAgreed. I remember going to see it in the cinema - not when it first came out, but in some sort of re-release later in the 70s - in a double-bill with Monte Carlo or Bust. Loved it ever since. Even the girls were intrigued when they caught the last few minutes the other day.
DeleteAnd I couldn’t stop thinking about the campaigns in those mountains in the 1740s whilst watching it. 😄
Chris
This looks good, Chris - I like your mini-campaign 'war on one table' concept! If memory serves there are two campaigns going on - The Spanish and Neapolitans pushing up from the South against the Austrians and Peidmontese, and the French and more Spanish trying to overrun Peidmont from Southern France ( which gives us the delightfully-named 'Gallispans' and 'Neapolispans' or is it 'Spanopolitans'? ) . Does this at least give the Austrians the benefit of figthing from a Central Position? I look forward to seeing how this goes!
ReplyDeleteYep! You remembered right. Napolispans?
DeleteChris
This looks very good! Wilkinson has a sharp map of the battlefield at Madonna dell’Olmo. Wilkinson is useful for getting a broad understanding of the campaign along with details on some of the battles. My copy I found on Google Books and many of the maps are first rate.
ReplyDeleteFor campaigning, I am considering looking at FRW in either 1796-97 or 1799-1800.
Yes, that MDO map is good. Though it doesn’t show which Piedmontese units are where. Interesting idea for a campaign - especially in the light of Wilkinson’s hypothesis.
ReplyDeleteChris