Tuesday, 26 December 2023

A baptism of fire: options

Hoping you've all been having a grand old time, and you and your loved ones are not all ready to brain each other. Over here, I always thought that the institution of the Boxing Day match fulfils a valuable social function in that regard. Anyway, enough of the small talk. I've been thinking about how to 'Christen' my new armies. Two main options occur:

(1)    A straightforward 're-fight';

(2)    Run a new mini-campaign along the same sort of lines I did last year, but limited to Italy.

Being a methodical sort, I drew up a table of battles in Italy in the 1740s (see below). 1744 looks very busy. I don't know if I missed any. This is a relatively new theatre to me. I just relied on Wiki*, and the appendix to The Art of War in the Age of Marlborough, which ends in 1745.  But I quite fancy doing the campaign. I could dust off the old rules, tweak them a bit to reflect the constrained geography. And Italy lends itself better to a long thin table.

Battle

Year

Date

Bourbon contestants

Bourbon number

Habsburg-Savoy contestants

Habsburg-Savoy number

Campo Santo

1743

           8 Feb

Spain, Naples

11,400 infantry,

2,600 cavalry,

12 guns

Austria

9,000 infantry,

3,000 cavalry,

25 guns

Casteldelfino

1744

          18 Jul

France

                        5,000

Piedmont

                        2,000

Velletri I

1744

          17 Jun

Spain

                        5,000

Austria

                        1,000

Bellino

1744

17-19 Jul

France, Spain

                        24,000

Piedmont

                        6,000

Velletri II

1744

         11 Aug

Spain, Naples

                        24,000

Austria

                        16,000

Villafranca

1744

14-27 Apr

France, Spain

                        30,000

Piedmont, Britain

                          8,000

Casteldelfino

1744

          18 Jul

France

                          5,000

Piedmont

                          2,000

Madonna Dell’Olmo

1744

         30 Sep

France, Spain

                        33,700

Piedmont, Austria

28-36,000

Bassignana

1745

         27 Sep

France, Spain, Genoa

                        70,000

Piedmont, Austria

                        55,000

Piacenza

1746

          16 Jun

Spain, France

25,000 Sp,

15,000 Fr

Austria

                        45,000

Rottofreddo

1746

        10 Aug

France, Spain

                        25,000

Austria

                        30,000

Assietta

1747

          19 Jul

France

                        25,000

Piedmont

                        15,000

Apologies for the formatting of this table. I had everything neatly aligned in the document I created it in, but Blogger seems to be throwing a spanner in the works.

I might have to invent some rules to reflect events outside the theatre which impinge on it. E.G. Frederick's invasion of Bohemia in 1744, kicking off the Second Silesian War, might cause the Austrians to pull back some troops from Italy.  Something to ponder during Escape to Victory, or whichever classic film is put on the telly, if I'm not reading this:

I ordered a print on demand paperback copy from an Indian company on the Abe Books platform. It's an old tome but very interesting reading. Being a facsimile, some of the maps are a bit poor on definition, but the text is fine.

One thing that the little exercise of pulling together this table did do, is remind me that there were several factions involved. On the 'Bourbon' side was the Kingdom of Naples (aka the Kingdom of Sicily*), ruled at this time by a son of the Spanish King Philip V, so an actual Bourbon, and the Republic of Genoa. Genoa, a regional rival of Piedmont, joined the Bourbon alliance part way through the war. In addition, I think the Duchy of Modena also provided troops for the Spanish side at some point. And the Royal Navy provided 1,000 marines for the fence of Villafranca/Villefranche (a port just east of Nice).

* I must do an explanation of the names at some point. Piedmont/Sardinia/(House of)Savoy is another one.

20 comments:

  1. It always seems 'complicated ' in Italy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. Even those nominally on the same side had objectives different enough to cause splits in the conduct of campaigns.
      Chris

      Delete
  2. Interesting theme. My introduction to it was Christopher Duffy's excellent biography of Maximilian von Browne.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A campaign I think would be the best option, but a small one (3-5 games) and quite simple too, based upon my experience. Anything longer or too complicated tends to lose steam, or maybe I'm a shallow knave who doesn't want anything too complicated😉!

    As for trying to understand the complicated picture of who ruled what, was in alliance with whom etc, I am reminded of the following quote by Palmerston:

    “The Schleswig-Holstein question is so complicated, only three men in Europe have ever understood it. One was Prince Albert, who is dead. The second was a German professor who became mad. I am the third and I have forgotten all about it.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can never remember the whole of that quote about the Schleswig-Holstein Question. Does that mean I’m Palmerston?
      The campaign I was thinking of was going to be like I did last year. A gridded table top of Italy, using figures with a vase representing X thousand troops. Battles and sieges would be played out in highly stylised fashion - a couple of opposed die rolls. Do the whole thing would be relatively simple and completed within hours.
      Chris

      Delete
    2. Base not vase! Though you could use small vases come to think of it.
      Chris

      Delete
  4. Never could remember who’s who or what’s what in this period - but go for it, it should be fun to watch you play these out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it’s like this….Elizabeth Farnese, 2nd wife of Philip V of Spain (grandson of Louis XIV and uncle of Louis XV of France) ….their son Charles, Duke of Parma, seized the Kingdom of Naples in 1734. Elizabeth wanted a throne in Italy her 2nd son Philip…meanwhile the Infante Ferdinand, 3rd son of Philip V (the other two died young) by his first wife, Maria Luisa Gabriella of Savoy, ….Then there’s the French branch of the Bourbons….
      Confused? You will be after this week’s episode of Soap.
      Chris

      Delete
    2. I think you’ve made my point for me! Ah Soap…classic.

      Delete
  5. Sounds like lots to ponder Chris... but isn't this part of what we love about our hobby.
    Looking forward to how this progresses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is indeed part of the fun Richard.
      Chris

      Delete
  6. I found this comment intriguing " Italy lends itself better to a long thin table." Is that because it's a long thin country, or are the battles of this period fought over long, thin countryside? :)
    Our "classic" Christmas movies this year were - Christmas Day - Downton Abbey - The Movie; Boxing Day - Downton Abbey - The Sequel!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah ha! It was the first. Actually, I’m wrong. It’s a long thin country with a fat but at the top. T-shaped really.
      Lots to keep me amused on telly this year, if I hadn’t seen them too often. Several episodes of Sharpe, A Bridge Too Far, 55 Days at Peking etc.
      Chris

      Delete
    2. Watched 20mins of the Italian Job - having seen it a gazillion times already over the years. Great film still.

      Delete
    3. Agreed. I remember going to see it in the cinema - not when it first came out, but in some sort of re-release later in the 70s - in a double-bill with Monte Carlo or Bust. Loved it ever since. Even the girls were intrigued when they caught the last few minutes the other day.
      And I couldn’t stop thinking about the campaigns in those mountains in the 1740s whilst watching it. 😄
      Chris

      Delete
  7. This looks good, Chris - I like your mini-campaign 'war on one table' concept! If memory serves there are two campaigns going on - The Spanish and Neapolitans pushing up from the South against the Austrians and Peidmontese, and the French and more Spanish trying to overrun Peidmont from Southern France ( which gives us the delightfully-named 'Gallispans' and 'Neapolispans' or is it 'Spanopolitans'? ) . Does this at least give the Austrians the benefit of figthing from a Central Position? I look forward to seeing how this goes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep! You remembered right. Napolispans?
      Chris

      Delete
  8. This looks very good! Wilkinson has a sharp map of the battlefield at Madonna dell’Olmo. Wilkinson is useful for getting a broad understanding of the campaign along with details on some of the battles. My copy I found on Google Books and many of the maps are first rate.

    For campaigning, I am considering looking at FRW in either 1796-97 or 1799-1800.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, that MDO map is good. Though it doesn’t show which Piedmontese units are where. Interesting idea for a campaign - especially in the light of Wilkinson’s hypothesis.
    Chris

    ReplyDelete