Right, since my last post on the matter I've managed to scrutinise the German General Staff map* and having obtained a copy of Duffy's the Army of Frederick the Great, I've cobbled together an order of battle based on the maps; and converted that to 'brigades' for Twilight of the Soldier Kings ('TOSK'). And I'm actually content with it. Finally.
The German General Staff map names all the regiments (of all three armies). I was able to cross-reference these against the army lists in the Army of Frederick the Great and the Army of Maria Theresa, to confirm which cavalry units were which type (cuirassier, dragoon, chevauxleger, hussar). The infantry was more straightforward to determine which were combined grenadier battalions/guard and which were ordinary musketeer/fusiliers.
The southern half of the battlefield. These maps really are beautiful. |
If you want to cut to the chase and avoid the waffle you can jump straight to the table below.
* admittedly this is a secondary source, produced 140 years after the event.
A note on names/language.
The town of Striegau (top right in the above map) was the point around which the Prussians orbited on their way to confront the enemy. The Saxons referred to the battle as Striegau and not Hohenfriedberg, which is off to the south west on the map below.
The region this was in, Silesia**, is now mostly in Poland. At the time it was a newly-acquired part of the Prussian state, passing via the German Empire into Polish control after WWI, and then again after WWII. Consequently Hohenfriedberg became Dobromierz and Striegau, Strzecom.
** Schlesien in German; Śląsk in Polish; Schläsing in Lower Silesian; Ślōnsk in Silesian.
Before becoming Prussian, it was part of the Habsburg realm. Before that it was part of the Kingdom of Poland. It seems like it's gone full circle.
Throughout I've used the German names, simply because they're the ones I'm more familiar with, and easier for me to say. Or rather, I probably pronounce them less incorrectly than I would the Polish names. Whilst in this period large numbers of inhabitants of Silesia spoke Lower Silesian (a German dialect), many spoke Silesian (a west Slavic language). What they called the towns and villages, I have no idea - NOT necessarily the same as the modern Polish names.
First some caveats.
(1) The number of Prussian squadrons.
I've assumed all cuirassier and dragoon regiments were at their complement of 5 squadrons apiece. Except the Garde du Corps (CR13) which I believe had only 1 squadron at this point, and it certainly looks that way on the map.
The hussars are not so straightforward. The size of the blocks on the map are the same size as the heavy cavalry. I've therefore assumed 5 squadrons apiece, except for Ziethen's regiment (HR2) which looks like it had the full complement of 10.
(2) The number of Austrian squadrons.
I've assumed all dragoons and cuirassiers were at 6 squadrons each. Hussars are not shown on any map. They don't appear to have been expected to take part in the main cavalry action in that period. Duffy says there were about 2,500 hussars and 'Croats' (i.e. Grenzers/light infantry) so I've assumed a 50:50 split. This equates to one 'brigade' of hussars in TOSK.
(3) 'Croats'
I've assumed 1/2 of the above mentioned light troops were 2 or 3 battalions, and converted this into 1 'brigade'. They'll sit somewhere in the centre, at the back with the Austrian hussars.
(4) Saxons
I can make out most of the names of the cavalry regiments and cross-reference these against Pagan apart from 3 names in the main line and two 'blocks' off to the left of the line. Pagan states that there were 4 squadrons of Karabiniersgarde, 12 of cuirassiers, 4 of chevauxlegers, 4 of dragoons and 22 companies of uhlans.
Apart from the Karabiniere most heavies were on a strength of 2 squadrons. The units I couldn't make out could therefore be 1 regiment of cuirassiers and 2 of dragoons. The second line of the detached block looks like it could be '5 pulks uhlans', a pulk being a Polish*** for a regiment. On the basis of this I've allocated the Saxons 2 brigades of cuirassiers, 1 of dragoons****, and 1 of uhlans.
For the infantry I've allocated 4 line brigades for the 18 battalions (with 1 being large), and 1 for the 18 companies of grenadiers.
*** the Elector of Saxony at the time of Hohenfriedberg was also King of Poland. This put him on the same level as the other Elector-King, Fredrick II, which probably irked Old Fritz no end.
**** The Chevauxlégers don't seem to have worn the cuirass and the troopers were referred to as 'dragoons', so I've assumed they're the same tactically.
General notes (not notes for Generals).
For the Prussians and Austrians I've allocated 1 brigade per 2 regiments of cavalry/10 or 12 squadrons, or 4 battalions of infantry. It doesn't always work out neatly in terms of which wing they were in so there's a certain amount of fudging. TOSK allows for normal, large and small brigades in any case.
Where there are different types of horse or foot interlaced (e.g. a dragoon unit between cuirassiers) I've moved them around to 'neaten' things up. In TOSK you can have mixed quality units, where you dice on first contact to determine which prevails, but I like to keep it simple for solo play. I've been more generous with the Saxons giving them a brigade for every 8 squadrons of heavies.
The General Staff map clearly marks each of the infantry unit blocks (is there a special term for these?) with those little sticks, one for each battalion. Thus it is easy to see which of the Austrian regiments has 2 and which has 3 battalions. For the Prussians incidentally only the regiment of Alt-Anhalt (IR3) had 3 battalions at Hohenfriedberg, and the Grenadier Garde (IR6, or Potsdam Grenadiers) had just the one. The Garde (IR15) are shown as having 2 of the 3 battalions present. All the rest of the Prussian infantry were on an establishment of 2 battalions.
Brigades for Twilight of the Soldier Kings.
Surprisingly the opponents were evenly matched in terms of numbers of men and units. 136 squadrons Prussians (more than Duffy but not as many as Chandler) versus 125 Austro-Saxons (counting an Uhlan company as 1/2 a squadron). The infantry faces off at 69 Prussian battalions against 71 Austro-Saxon battalions.
The Prussians have a slight edge in cavalry numbers, but the Allies have more cuirassiers. The Prussians have a distinct qualitative edge in infantry, and more heavy guns. Light pieces are not classed as game pieces in TOSK.
Total Brigades | ||
Prussians | Austro-Saxons | |
Cuirassiers | 5 | 7 |
Dragoons | 5 | 3 |
Hussars | 3 | 1 |
Uhlans | 0 | 1 |
Garde/Grenadiers | 5 | 2 |
Musketeers | 12 | 15 |
Croats | 0 | 1 |
Heavy Guns | 3 | 2 |
33 | 32 |
In terms of the overall numbers of men engaged, this seems bout right. The Prussians had more cavalry and the Allies had more infantry. Fuller detail is shown below, including the split between the different wings.
I need to allocate subordinate commanders to each army.
Next Step
Next on the agenda is to work out a way of creating a game that reflects the semi-encounter nature of the battle. The whole field can be contained within an area of 3 miles by 4, or about 108 x 132 centimetres, if I use the German General Staff map.
Maybe I should just go with this layout |
The full OOBs.
The regimental designations were only given much later after the war, and contemporaries used the Inhaber's name (i.e. the Colonel-Proprietor). 'Bde' refers to Twilight of the Soldier Kings game units.
Desig | Sq | Bn | Cav. Bde | Inf Bde | Artillery Bde | Remarks | |
Prussian OOB | |||||||
Right Wing | |||||||
Natzmer | HR4 | 5 | 1 | Large | |||
Reusch | HR5 | 5 | |||||
Suldan | HR6 | 5 | |||||
Garde du Corps | CR13 | 1 | 1 | 1 small elite | |||
Gensd’armes | CR10 | 5 | |||||
Buddenbrock | CR1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
Prinz v.Preussen | CR2 | 5 | |||||
Leib-Karabinier | CR11 | 5 | 1 | ||||
Kyau | CR12 | 5 | |||||
Möllendorf | DR6 | 10 | 1 | ||||
Possadowsky | DR1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
Wurttemburg | DR2 | 5 | |||||
Grenadiers | 12 | 3 | |||||
Holstein-Beck | 11 | 2 | 1 | ||||
La Motte | 17 | 2 | |||||
Alt-Anhalt | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Prinz Moritz | 22 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Hesse-Darmstadt | 12 | 2 | |||||
Hautcharmoy | 28 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Polenz | 4? | 2 | |||||
Kalckstein | 25 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Lehwald | 14 | 2 | |||||
Artillery | 2 | ||||||
Centre | |||||||
Alt-Wurttemburg | DR11 | 5 | 1 | ||||
Nassau | DR12 | 5 | |||||
Bronikowski | HR1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
Hallasz | HR7 | 5 | |||||
Truchess | 13 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Markgraf Karl | 19 | 2 | |||||
Garde | 15 | 2 | 1 | Small | |||
Grenadier Garde | 6 | 1 | |||||
Hacke | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Blanckensee | 23 | 2 | |||||
Bevern | 7 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Schlichting | 2 | 2 | |||||
Dohna | 4? | 2 | 1 | ||||
Alt-Schwerin | 24 | 2 | |||||
Du Moulin | 37 | 2 | Fusilier | ||||
Borcke | 29 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Jeetze | 30 | 2 | |||||
Bredow | 21 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Hertzberg | 20 | 2 | |||||
Bonin | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Anhalt-Zerbst | 8 | 2 | |||||
Grenadiers | 5 | 1 | |||||
Artillery | 1 | ||||||
Left Wing | |||||||
DR5 | DR5 | 10 | 1 | Bayreuth | |||
CR8 | CR8 | 5 | 1 | ||||
CR9 | CR9 | 5 | |||||
CR4 | CR4 | 5 | 1 | Large | |||
CR5 | CR5 | 5 | |||||
CR7 | CR7 | 5 | |||||
DR3 | DR3 | 5 | 1 | ||||
DR4 | DR4 | 5 | |||||
HR2 | HR2 | 10 | 1 | ||||
Prussian Totals | 136 | 69 | 13 | 17 | 3 | ||
Austrian OOB | |||||||
Right Wing | |||||||
Hohenembs | CR4 | 6 | 1 | ||||
K.St Ignon | CR22 | 6 | |||||
J.Pálffy | C27 | 6 | 1 | ||||
Diemar | C33 | 6 | |||||
Bernes | C21 | 6 | 1 | ||||
F.St.Ignon | C12 | 6 | |||||
Liechtenstein | D6 | 6 | 1 | ||||
Preysing | Dii | 6 | |||||
Wurttemburg | D38 | 6 | 1 | Large | |||
Philipert | D37 | 6 | |||||
Althann | D1 | 6 | |||||
Centre | |||||||
1st line | |||||||
Franz Lothringen | IR1 | 3 | 5 | ||||
Alt-Königsegg | IR54 | 3 | |||||
Hessen-Kassel | IR37 | 3 | |||||
Thüngen | IR57 | 3 | |||||
Grünne | IR26 | 3 | |||||
Maschall | IR18 | 2 | |||||
Baden-Baden | IR23 | 3 | |||||
2nd line | |||||||
Karl Lotharingen | IR3 | 3 | 3 | 1 large | |||
Harrach | IR47 | 2 | |||||
Neipperg | IR7 | 2 | |||||
Leopold Daun | IR59 | 3 | |||||
Kollowrat | IR17 | 3 | |||||
Hussars | HR24 | 1 | |||||
Croats | ? | 3 | 1 | ||||
Artillery | 2 | ||||||
Left Wing | |||||||
Grenadiers | N/A | 4 | 1 | 16 companies | |||
1st line | |||||||
Vettes | IR34 | 3 | 3 | ||||
Botta | IR12 | 3 | |||||
2nd line | |||||||
Gyulai | IR51 | 4 | |||||
Browne | IR36 | 2 | |||||
Cavalry | |||||||
Birkenfeld | CR23 | 6 | 1 | ||||
Czernin | CRiii | 6 | |||||
Lucchesi | CRii | 6 | 1 | ||||
K.Pálffy | CR8 | 6 | |||||
Saxon OOB | |||||||
Infantry | 18 | 4 | Inferior, 1 large | ||||
Grenadiers | 1 | 1 | 18 companies. Standard/trained | ||||
Cavalry | |||||||
Königlicher Prinz | CR2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Maffei | CR3 | 2 | |||||
Garde Karabinier | GC | 4 | |||||
O’Bryan | CR5 | 2 | |||||
Gersdorff | CR8 | 2 | |||||
Haudring | CR4 | 2 | |||||
? | CR? | 2 | |||||
? | DR | 4 | 1 | ||||
? | CLR | 4 | |||||
Uhlans | 11 | 1 | 22 companies (Fahnen) | ||||
Allied Totals | 125 | 71 | 12 | 18 | 2 |
that map is beautiful!!
ReplyDeleteWow , you have obviously put a significant amount of effort into researching and planning this game, very impressive work!
ReplyDeleteI ought to get out more!
DeleteI admire you focus and rigour…makes me feel such a light weight. Looking forward to seeing the battle 👍
ReplyDeleteOne man’s rigour is another man’s mortis 😉
DeleteThat is a lovely map for sure and I reckon would look nice mounted in the games room. Your extra time and research seems well spent and the OOB seem reasonable and as is often the case, a bit of fudging is required here and there to make things work game wise. I'm certainly looking forward to seeing this on the table:)
ReplyDeleteThat would be great. I wonder if I can get away with it in the multi-purpose games room? There isn’t a lot of spare wall space actually.
DeleteI will tuck this research away for another time.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Wow, I'm very much impressed how you worked on that battle.
ReplyDeleteThanks. It was a labour of love.
DeleteCan I add my congratulations on putting this all together and making a cracking scenario.
ReplyDeleteI have done a few notes myself on this battle and came to more or less the same OOB you did.
Nick Dorrell
Thanks Nick. It would be interesting to see where your OOB differed. Especially as you wrote the rules.
DeleteI only really did a very quick draft OOB, basically to see if the battle looked viable as a game - which it certainly does.
DeleteI was trying to decide which 2 or 4 WAS battles to do next as scenarios.
It was certainly not as thoroughly looked at as yours or as detailed. Sadly I think there will always be question marks with the OOB for this battle but having compared yours and mine I will be looking at yours when/if I get round to it :)
Excellent work and I hope you do more.
I have a mind to do Fontenoy. I’ve found the historical OOBs. Possibly on the back-burner until I build up the armies. Interim plan is Rossbach, for which I only need a smaller amount of French, and none of the Pragmatic Army. Rossbach is obviously tricky with hindsight so takes more design effort.
DeleteI am intending to do Fontenoy in the next group of scenarios I do. Rossbach is tricky and for my scenario in the scenario book I offered 3 possible battles. The 1st just focuses on the historical action - so the Prussian cavalry are poised to attack. The 2nd option rewinds the action back to the Franco Imperialist attempt to manoeuvre around the inactive Prussians - i.e. the French are trying an Oblique Order attack. The final option has the 2 armies in their original camps and the play goes from there.
ReplyDelete