Further to the previous post, I did a bit more digging into the Saxon campaign of late 1745. The principle source I used was the Helion publication Kesselsdorf 1745 by Alexander Querengässer, supplemented by Christopher Duffy's Frederick the Great: A Military Life and The Army of Frederick the Great (both editions). It took several readings of and copious notes on Querengässer's chapter on the campaign leading up to the battle to get a proper handle on events.
The reason I wanted to get the events straight is to try to understand the campaign and what possibilities there were for the game. In essence the campaign was fairly straightforward. The Saxons and Austrians planned to invade Brandenburg (the Prussian heartland) after the normal campaigning season ended. The Prussians were alert to this and planned a pre-emptive strike which not only aimed to forestall the invasion but to knock Saxony out of the war and keep the Austrians bottled up in Bohemia. The campaign was launched when in late November a small Austrian force under Grünne invaded Brandenburg in a very scaled down version of an earlier plan, whilst Charles of Lorraine with a sizeable Austrian force. Frederick launched a countermove from the east which made Charles retreat back into Bohemia, and Leopold of Anhalt-Dessau marched into Saxony from the west. The Saxons and Grünne fell back on Dresden and Charles eventually moved back into Saxony via a different route. Charles arrived in the Dresden area but never fully joined up with the Saxons. Leopold defeated the Saxons at Kesselsdorf south west of Dresden on 15th December and Dresden fell a few days later. The Saxons sued for peace and Austria recognised Frederick's conquest of Silesia (the reason for the war in the first place).
I made a table in date order of all my notes. Next I'll use these to generate some 'inflection points' when I'll dice for possible options. This will be good to introduce an element of uncertainty in a solo game. e.g. "what date will Leopold leave Leipzig", and "will Leopold head for Torgau (most likely) or head more directly to Dresden? I'll also look at things like what effect Sachsen-Weissenfels sackings will have on Saxon operations. Broadly the plan is to start operations on 20th November but dice for when people get to where they are going and for how long they stay in a particular place.
Date | Action |
30 Sep | Sachsen-Weissenfels resigned as CinC at end of September after his proposal to make peace was rejected. |
13 Oct | Grünne - left Heiddlberg with 8k Austrians. Due to start joint ops 20 Nov. Torgau-Uebigau on Black Elster. |
20 Nov | Charles - crossed border at Zittau 18k Austrians 3k Saxons. |
20 Nov | Grünne at Zittau |
21 Nov | Charles moves to Görlitz |
22 Nov | Frederick sent orders to Leopold to invade Saxony. |
22 Nov | Leopold left his Dessau residence for Halle where his troops were. |
23 Nov | Frederick crosses the border into Lusatia at Naumburg (Silesia - Now Nowogrodziec, Poland). |
23 Nov | Battle of Hennersdorf. Ziethen with 20 sq H + 10sq C beats 2bn +6sq Saxons at Hennersdorf in Lusatia east of Görlitz. |
23 Nov? | Grünne reaches 7 miles from Berlin. But what type of miles? German Mile = 7.5km so = 52.5km or 33 English miles). Grünne withdraws to Grossenhain roughly halfway between Torgau and Dresden. |
24 Nov | |
25 Nov | Leopold receives Frederick’s orders to invade Saxony. Leopold delays while he is preparing 9 days bread supply for his army and replenished the draft horses. |
25 Nov | Frederick takes Görlitz |
26 Nov | |
27 Nov | News of Frederick’s victory at Hennersdorf arrived with explicit instructions to attack Leipzig arrived |
27 Nov | Charles retreats across the border at Zittau pursued by the Prussians. |
28 Nov | |
29 Nov | Leopold finally left Halle. Delay possibly due to Leopold not interpreting the Austrian advance into Lusatia as a breach of Saxon neutrality as Lusatia was technically under Bohemian sovereignty although it was ruled by the Saxon Elector. |
29 Nov | Action at Schkeuditz: Prussians under Bredow with 4sq Cuirassiers, 1sq from each Dragoon regiment (max 6) and 2 Hussar regiments. Saxons under Sibilski with 1 Chevaux Legers regiments and 2 pulks of Uhlans. Saxons retreat via Schönefeld to Grimma south east of Leipzig. |
27-30 Nov | Frederick detaches Lehwaldt with 8500 men to join up with Leopold via Meissen. |
30 Nov | Leipzig captured by Leopold. |
1 Dec | Renard at Mutzchen |
1 Dec | Sachsen-Weissenfels reinstated as CinC. |
1 Dec | Friederick August abandons Dresden for Prague. |
2 Dec | Renard at Lommatzsch |
3 Dec | Leopold leaves Leipzig for Torgau |
3 Dec | Renard at Wilsdruf |
4 Dec | Frederick hears that Leopold has captured Leipzig |
4 Dec | Renard at Dresden with Dietmar |
5 Dec | On 5 Dec Frederick learned that Charles had gone behind the border range and was heading down the Elbe into Saxony. |
6 Dec | Leopold enters Torgau. |
7 Dec | |
8 Dec | Lehwaldt at Gröbern 4km east of Meissen |
9 Dec | Lehwaldt demands surrender of Meissen |
9 Dec | Sachsen-Weissenfels convenes a council of war at which it is decided to open operations against Leopold on 13 Dec as soon as Charles arrived, rather than take on Frederick. |
10 Dec | Frederick at Bautzen. |
11 Dec | Leopold marches to Strehla |
12 Dec | Leopold marches to Meissen |
12 Dec | Charles promises to lead his troops to Dresden as quickly as possible allowing time to cross the Erzegebirge. |
12 Dec? | A ‘few days’ after the 9 Dec council of war Frederick August II withdrew his confidence from Sachsen-Weissenfels. |
13 Dec | Lehwaldt crosses the repaired bridge over the Elbe into Meissen in the early hours |
13 Dec | Leopold’s rearguard in action against Sybilski’s 2 pulls of uhlans |
13 Dec | Charles’ army camped between Pirna and the Grossergarten in Dresden. Spread 1/2 day’s march apart. Austrian troops ‘rioting’ over lack of supplies. |
13 Dec | Rutowski and Grünne ordered north to confront Leopold. They occupy the heights near Kesselsdorf. |
14 Dec | Leopold’s army bivouacs between Naudstadt and Röhrsdorf (half way from Meissen to Wilsdruff) |
14 Dec | Frederick receives news of the capture of Meissen and orders his army to go there. |
15 Dec | Battle of Kesselsdorf |
16 Dec | |
17 Dec | Dresden surrenders |
25 Dec | End of hostilities (Second Silesian War) |
Commander | Location on 20m Nov | Troops |
Leopold | Halle | Pagan says: 24,577 - 28bn 63sq 32 heavy guns. |
Frederick | Liegnitz? | 30,000 inc Lehwaldt. Assume 20 heavy guns. Lehwaldt: 30 sq 10bn 2 H reg) |
Rutowski: | Dresden | 22 heavy guns |
Renard | Leipzig | 20bn 23 sqn 2 pulks Uhlans |
Diemer | Meissen | 11bn 12 sq 2pulks uhlans |
Other Saxons | Assume Dresden | 10 sq |
Charles | Gabel/Reichenberg | 18,000 Austrians, 3,000 Saxons Assumptions: Saxons 4 bn, 2 regt cav Austrians 14,000 inf, 4,000 cav 20 heavy guns |
Grünne | Uebigau on the Black Elster | 8,000 Austrians: 10 bn, 1 Grenadier bn, 1000 Croats, 2 cuir reg (14 sq), 2 Hr reg. |
Depot | Görlitz | |
Depot | Zittau | |
Depot | Leipzig | |
Depot | Torgau | |

Some great planning work Chris and the map is excellent. Will the campaign involve the potential for more than one tabletop clash, or is everything off table until your armies reach Kesseldorf?
ReplyDeleteThere could be any number of tabletop clashes. Just depends on how things unfold. Theoretically. But I might be tempted to stack the odds so there’s at least one sizeable battle.
DeleteChris
Great work on the background of the battle. Probably you will get a nice compact campaign, unless you
ReplyDeleteRadio it astray.
Thanks. Hopefully I'll keep it on track. I'll have to. Limited time available.
DeleteChris, you could stack the odds by using the map as a background, but making movement significant point to significant point, rather than free movement.
ReplyDeleteNeil
Yes. I think I will limit movement along roads to towns, although there's at least one day when the Prussians stop midway between towns (the night before Kesselsdorf).
DeleteVery detailed planning and a lovely map, nice! AI has decided I'm a dedicated follower of Grimsby and I get updates every time they play,its a bit weird to be honest!
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Ha ha! These algorithms can get it very wrong can't they. I remember when I uploaded the Google app on my phone a few years ago to make it easier to get on to Blogger, it must have picked up on my liking for "football" because I'd searched for Grimsby Town stuff and once clicked on something about Arsenal. Then it was throwing all sorts of transfer rumours about top stars and other tittle tattle. It also went completely mad bringing up articles about American football. Strewth!
DeleteBlimey mate that’ll keep you busy. Should make for some interesting blog posts mind you.
ReplyDeleteYou’ve got me worried now.
DeleteChris
Great planning Chris. I love the old maps and using them for movement will be a treat.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with the old maps are that they are difficult to read so I’ll need to come up with a solution. They’re good sources of information though.
DeleteChris
You are laying the groundwork for an interesting campaign. For me, the map is a hard one to read. I wonder if the VASSAL gamebox for Struggle of Nations covers most of the ground with some clarity?
ReplyDeletehttps://vassalengine.org/library/projects/The_Struggle_of_Nations.
Yes, it doesn’t look very good as a basis of map movements. I’ll use it as a reference and maybe make a draft based on that. For details of terrain I’ll refer to the area maps. At this stage I’m planning to do point to point movement rather than areas. Though those screenshots of maps on that Vassal link look good.
DeleteChris
This is great. You've created a real backstory for your battle. I know some fellow modellers create similar backstories for their model railway layouts.
ReplyDeleteMy wargames are usually skirmishes and I like to create small scenarios for them. I also plan to do a festive wargame this year as well, but I think I will just do the opposite of you; No other scenario than just to take and hold the table top. It's in the 'fantasy' genre.
I can’t claim credit for creating the backstory Roger. That was all the work of the people who lived in the 1740s and subsequent historians.
DeleteSometimes it’s great just to get the toys on the table and have a game. Whether it’s historical or fantasy. That’s the great thing about this hobby. Plenty of diverse ways of doing things.
Chris
Excellent background work there Chris:). I love the maps, especially looking at the key to see how they represented towns etc, plus it shows what was considered important then.
ReplyDeleteThey’re great aren’t they? A window into the past. Wonder how much the atlas costs.
DeleteChris
Looks like all your hardwork and research is coming together.
ReplyDeleteThe hard bit comes next. The thinking about how I’m going to make this work. I’m not naturally an innovator. But the challenge is part of it for me.
DeleteChris
Great work on the planning, I just don’t seem to have the patience for such excellent work 👍
ReplyDeleteI don’t have the patience or knack to do the great looking table set-ups you do Matt. I do admin!
DeleteChris
This looks realy interesting, your research and planning is impressive! That atlas looks fantastic too - could be yours for only 9,000 Euros, I see ( + P&P of course.. )
ReplyDeleteThanks but I wouldn't say it's impressive research. I read a chapter of one book a couple of times plus a few paras of another and made painstaking notes.
Delete€9000? A bargain.