The game will be a re-hash of Hastenbeck in July 1757. The French, under D'Estrees, numbered 50,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry, attacked the Army of Observation* (30,000 infantry and 5,000 cavalry) under the Duke of Cumberland. The French have a big advantage in numbers and also have a tactical advantage having stolen a march on the Hanoverian flank. The Orbat is courtesy of the excellent Kronoskaf. Rules will be Twilight of the Soldier Kings. The table is 4 feet by 4 feet. Hope to get the game in some time on Sunday.
* This consisted of Hanoverian, Hessian, Brunswicker and Schaumberg-Lippe troops (in order of declining numbers of troops). The last named state contributed just the one squadron, the unusually attired Bückeburg Carabiniers. No British at this stage of the war in Germany. As the Army of Observation is a bit of a mouthful, I'll probably just use 'Hanoverian'. Not 'German' as D'Estrees' army included German regiments (in the French army) plus contributions from the Palatinate and Austria. Likewise, I'm being a stickler about the use of 'Allies' since both sides were effectively alliances. I will refer to D'Estrees' host as 'French'. The Duke of Cumberland was the third son of George II (King of Great Britain & Ireland and Elector of Hanover). We saw 'Gus' in the Fontenoy games last month.
French columns on the right. I might need to re-check the numbers as I might have slightly underdone the number of French troops. |
French infantry of the centre under Contades. |
I have been considering Hastenbeck, myself.
ReplyDeleteWould you concentrate on the attack on Cumberland’s left?
DeleteChris
It is certainly a decent sized action for a 4 x 4 table, Chris - one of the obvious advantages of the smaller scale figures, of course. I look forward to reading how it all goes.
ReplyDeleteCuts down on the walking too!
DeleteChris
Gotta love the smaller scales. Imagine trying to kit this one out in 28mm.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Units (brigades) are 2 bases of 60mm so you will get 6 x 28mm chaps in the space of 50.
DeleteChris
So it could be done in larger scales but figures/units would be more like 'gaming counters', this way you get much more impression of a 'big battle'. It looks good, I look forward to the battle report ( oh hang on, you've already posted it!)
DeleteLooking good Chris and I've always loved the name of the 'Army of Observation'. Small scales naturally get my vote as you can fit a lot of action into a small space, relatively speaking.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve. It’s certainly an interesting name. It doesn’t sound like they were the most aggressive army ever. And then there was the contemporary Russian Observation Corps, which didn’t have a happy time.
DeleteChris/Nundanket