I came across this on the BBC website. Whilst not specifically about wargaming, it is 'adjacent'. Enjoy.
Ruminations on wargaming, especially the Seven Years War, the English Civil War and other 'black powder' periods. Occasional forays into obscure Nordic music and opinionated 'dribble' [sic] on Grimsby Town Football Club.
Tuesday, 20 January 2026
Italian WAS Campaign Background Reading
In my last post on the subject of my proposed Po Valley Campaign for the 1740s I mentioned my next steps. Firstly:
- Identify orders of battle
- Set-out campaign objectives
So to tackle both of these I started reading. I read the relevant parts of the book below. And I searched on t'internet. I found this which gives a very brief, but useful overview of the Italian theatre in the WAS:
https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/the-war-of-austrian-succession-in-italy-1740-1748
I'd recommend it to anyone who's vaguely interested in the subject. I used it to draft a brief narrative. I wasn't able to find a lot of other resources in English on the subject. The usual rule seems to apply: if the Brits (and later Americans) weren't there it might as well not have happened in the Anglophone world. At least there is something on the subject - more than say on the War of the Polish Succession*. At least Britain had some involvement via the Royal Navy (and subsidies to belligerents) in the WAS in Italy.
It is another useful overview, of the whole WAS, with a section on Italy. There's LOTS more of interest on that site.
Wikipedia is pretty limited on the subject. And there are some dead ends. For example, you can find a Wiki page on the Second Battle of Casteldelfino (1744), but the link to the First Battle (1743) leads you back to the Second. But if you search in Italian you can find both, though to be fair, they are also brief. I've found before when searching for stuff for this period on Wiki that you can often find things in other languages when they are not available in English. Translation is relatively easy these days with all the tools available, but to be honest, a lot of it is fairly clear if you have a smattering of the language (or even a related language) and military terminology. I like to have a stab at reading it first then use a translation tool to check and fill in the gaps/correct my errors.
So, that lead me to this resource in Spanish:
https://arrecaballo.es/siglo-xviii/guerra-de-sucesion-austriaca-1740-48/
Naturally there is going to be a lot more available in Spanish as they were one of the major participants. Arguably, if it wasn't for the Spanish, there wouldn't have been much campaigning done in Italy. Austria had its own wish list but being occupied fighting in Germany and the Low Countries, it probably wouldn't have started fighting in Italy at that time, but for the Spanish Bourbon family's desire to acquire new territory. The Arrecaballo site has a handy little table of army strengths (although for France and Austria this includes numbers elsewhere). However, I am confident I can infer numbers from elsewhere.
So all of this reading has helped give me a better idea of what went on. I had a rough idea of campaign objectives but it helped expand on that and fill in a notable gap: the Austrian wish to re-gain the Kingdom of Naples. In addition I found a few maps which have helped me flesh out my sketch map. It still needs a bit of work but it's nearly there. I have quite a few notes to review and make sense of, which I'll be doing this week.
The main areas of the prospective game that I still feel are somewhat lacking are supply and intelligence. I want to have some simple rules/guidelines that are admin light but permit these important aspects to be 'modelled'. Somehow.
I'm aiming to get things ready for next week as the Margravina will be away and the youngsters are back at uni, allowing me a relatively free hand in the evenings. There is the small matter of a football match to go to, but knowing the weather forecast and the track record of that place, there's a good chance it will be postponed.
Better get cracking!
Monday, 12 January 2026
On the campaign trail again
As trailed in a previous post, I've been thinking about getting another campaign going. The options were both to be set in the War(s*) of Austrian Succession: Italy or the Austrian Netherlands. I plumped for Italy, and specifically, the northern theatre, as I want to make more use of the Piedmontese and Spanish armies I painted. I realise I could say the same about the Dutch, but it's 2:1 The Austrian Netherlands can come later.
* I prefer "Wars" as I see it more as a, sometimes loosely, connected set of conflicts. The Habsburgs and Bourbons continued to fight after the end of the Prussian-Austrian conflict (1st and 2nd Silesian Wars). The Spanish Bourbons were already fighting the British when the Silesian Wars kicked off, and for a couple of years, the British were 'auxiliaries' of the Habsburgs in the Low Countries. Similarly the Anglo-French colonial conflict had a life of its on.
This campaign will be different from my previous foray into the WAS in Italy as that was for the whole of the war and the whole of Italy. Also it was really a hex map game with figures for counters. This new campaign will be more like the recent Saxon campaign with point to point map moves and actions fought out as table top games with figures.
My first step was to map the map. I've basically traced modern Italy, mostly the Po valley from west of Turin to the Gulf of Venice. As well as the Po and other major rivers, I have marked in key roads and towns. Each town being a day's march apart.
It's a bit rough at the moment. I intend to shade in the Alps and the Apennines and sea. Many towns (dots) have been left unnamed simply for legibility purposes. Actually, also because where roads cross the mountains I've spaced the towns closer together so the same distance takes twice as long to cross. There is very little scope to cross the mountains laterally as evidenced by the road network and my main focus is on the Po valley. There are different options for east-west movement - decisions will be diced for at each nodal point based on a rough assessment of probabilities.
Two key things to work out now:
- Orders of Battle
- Campaign objectives and scope
The Saxon campaign had a very limited window - based on the weeks leading up to the end of 1745 and it had to be completed within my time off at Christmas and New Year. The Po campaign will have more time, both in historical setting and in playing time. My immediate thought on objectives is the Spanish aim to recapture Milan and Parma from the Habsburgs. But it will be more complicated than that as there are 3 (possibly 4 or 5) other parties:
Austria: obviously wanting to keep Milan and Parma
France: generally helping Spain (as they were ruled by the same family firm) and weakening Austria in the context of France's struggle for hegemony in the Low Countries and Germany
Piedmont-Savoy (aka the Kingdom of Sardinia): to remain independent and to stop Spain taking Milan and avoid being surrounded by Bourbon territory.
Naples: part of the Bourbon family firm. The ruler owed Spain a favour for help in recovering the Naples for them in the War of the Polish Succession
Britain: traditional foe of France and Spain, and ally of Austria on the basis of my enemy's enemy....
The hard part will be setting an end point. If Spain captures Milan and Parma, will the game be over or will Austria have a chance to grab them back as they wouldn't have just given up, unless they reached exhaustion point. And that would at least partly depend on what was happening north of the Alps.
Other bits and pieces to ponder:
Sieges will be abstracted - I'll probably adapt the siege section from my previous Italian campaign. Though I might be tempted to try Siege Works.
Intelligence: who knows what and when. Some simple scouting points maybe.
I will also have to adopt a mechanism for ensuring rest days are taken, and a way of tracking these.
Battles will be played out using Twilight of the Soldier Kings or WRG 1685-1845 depending on the scale.
Last but not least, I will think about some simple supply rules.
So more thinking to be done!
Wednesday, 7 January 2026
List again!
Tentative Order | Job |
1 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 | Flag SYW figures (French priority) |
10 | Paint villagers (6 and 10mm) |
11 | Paint sheep |
12 | Paint pack animals |
13 | Try Alala! |
14 | Try Siege Works rules |
15 | Paint wagons and gun teams |
16 | Decide what to do with SYW odds and sods |
17 | Paint petard crews etc |
18 | Make fortress |
19 | Ottoman painting guide |
20 | Order Irregular Ottoman army |
21 | Paint Ottomans |
22 | Run ECW siege campaign |
23 | Make AWI boats |
24 | Maybe rebase some Romans |
25 | Build & paint sailing ships |
Thursday, 1 January 2026
Saxony 1745 Campaign - Closing moves
I totted up the troops remaining to Leopold and Rutowski after the battle and came up with the following numbers of bases (2 bases making up a brigade):
Rutowski
Cuirassier 4
Dragoon 3
Hussar 3
Uhlan 2
Grenadier/guard 4
Musketeer 7
Grenzer 2
Heavy Artillery 0
Leopold
Cuirassier 8
Dragoon 6
Hussar 4
Grenadier 1
Musketeer 11
Fusilier 2
Heavy Artillery 3
With Frederick's arrival on 14th the Prussian totals are:
Total | Observation Corps | Field Army | |
Cuirassiers | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Dragoons | 10 | 2 | 8 |
Hussars | 8 | 2 | 6 |
Grenadiers | 5 | 1 | 4 |
Musketeers | 18 | 8 | 10 |
Fusiliers | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Artillery | 5 | 2 | 3 |
The Observation Corps under Leopold* remained before Dresden whilst Frederick took the field army to tackle Charles.
*Frederick decided the old boy need a rest, though cynics said the King was jealous of his old Field Marshall's success.
Against Frederick Charles could only muster:
Charles | |
Cuirassiers | 4 |
Dragoons | 2 |
Hussars | 2 |
Uhlans | 0 |
Grenadiers | 2 |
Musketeers | 12 |
Grenzers | 0 |
Heavy artillery | 2 |
In a mellow tone
I had cause to remember this band earlier. I didn’t nt remember the cause. Very, very romantic when they sing in French. With this song I can imagine M.Broom (qui est surnommé le joyeux) dancing with Mme Broom. And pourquoi pas, eh?
Love the way the usually pretty unvoiced e is vocalised. Reminds me of those films c1990 based on Marcel Pagnol books. And of the Little Sparrow of course.